Tried both formulas and made exactly the same replacements: 17.
For the moment it seems no difference.
Now, with this formula seems impossible to detect some particles like «de» that are sustancial in the f/search:
for example two uppercases between Maria de Montesco, as this connector is part of the search.
In the old formula it is easily applied:
\<\u\l{2,} de( \u\l{2,})+\>
For
I'm not sure that I understand what you mean by "where we have many $n to one of them".
I mean, I only need to apply a character style/a colour to $2 (for example) and leave the $1, $3 without information.
May I select only one of the them?
Thank you, Peter.
Message was edited by: camilo umaña